Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Weld size, HSS to cap plate, AISC Design Guide 24 example 4.1 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

lewilder

Structural
Feb 1, 2017
2
Hi all,

Looking to untangle a discrepancy in example 4.1 of AISC Design Guide 24, Beam over HSS Column Connection. Another engineer tripped over it in 2015, apparently without resolution -- thread507-401175 -- and I see no reference to the issue in the published errata.

Toward the end of the design example, we read: "Assuming a 45 degree maximum load dispersion angle, the weld of the cap plate to the HSS can be checked by evaluating a load per inch of the lesser of Tr/g or Tr/(db +2b), where b is the distance from the bolt center to the face of the HSS." Bold-face emphases are mine, throughout this post.

Skipping a few lines, the example goes on: "Determine the greater of Tr/g or Tr/db+2b):"

At this point the LRFD example marches down the left side of the page, using the maximum, Tu/g, to determine the weld size.

Meanwhile the ASD example veers to the right, declaring it will use Ta/(db+2b), which is the minimum value, for weld size determination.

I'm new enough to this kind of design that I can only guess that we should be addressing the larger of these two line loads. Can anyone verify? Or is this a case where I should try pinging the authors? My thanks to everyone on this forum, by the way; I've come here many times to find my questions already answered.


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

On page 37, the ASD example says "Use Ta/(db+2b)", but the value used in the following box is Ta/g. I think that's where the typo is. The ASD example should say "Use Ta/g." Then on page 36, where they say to use the lesser of, it should read use the greater of.

I don't know why AISC makes their examples so confusing, but they often do. A simpler way would be to say, the effective weld length per bolt is the smallest of: g, db+2b, or B/2.
 
My thanks, nutte, and the "smallest of: g, db+2b, or B/2" is beautifully easy to comprehend. I've also written up my confusion over the lesser/greater/maximum/minimum inconsistencies and sent a note to AISC to ask if it might be included in the next batch of errata. Thanks again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor