ebdoep2
Mechanical
- Apr 21, 2011
- 27
Before I get to the question, the background. I am solving a 2D plane strain problem. An attached image shows the typical deflections. There are multiple materials and a beam element runs almost horizontally down the center. I have a pretty good handle on what the different options on the elements mean, mathematically, but I am lost on what in practice is the difference and reason for selection. I have run the model with almost every combination and for one load case and see about a 2-3% difference mainly when changed from linear to quadratic in the plane strain elements. One of the materials has a poisson's ratio v=~0.5, so all elements are hybrid. So far I have tried.
For the planar portion
CPE8RH
CPE8H
CPE4H
CPE4IH
CPE6MH
CPE6H
CPE3H
For the Beam:
B22
B21
B23
The planar elements make up a majority of the structures stiffness. I have read through the manual but it can go back and forth on which elements are better for bending dominated problems (though I think since there are so many elements through the vertical direction, this is not bending dominated), which elements produce a more accurate result and etc. But again it gets very difficult to determine from its vague language what would be a good choice for me.
Since this is for an optimization study and not a super exact model, should I just call the %3 difference in elements insignificant and choose what gives me the best results, or convergence the best at large deflections?
More potentially useful information:
-NLGEOM on
-The model is used in optimization but the models solves quick enough that the expense of one element over another is not significant.
For the planar portion
CPE8RH
CPE8H
CPE4H
CPE4IH
CPE6MH
CPE6H
CPE3H
For the Beam:
B22
B21
B23
The planar elements make up a majority of the structures stiffness. I have read through the manual but it can go back and forth on which elements are better for bending dominated problems (though I think since there are so many elements through the vertical direction, this is not bending dominated), which elements produce a more accurate result and etc. But again it gets very difficult to determine from its vague language what would be a good choice for me.
Since this is for an optimization study and not a super exact model, should I just call the %3 difference in elements insignificant and choose what gives me the best results, or convergence the best at large deflections?
More potentially useful information:
-NLGEOM on
-The model is used in optimization but the models solves quick enough that the expense of one element over another is not significant.
