hokie66
Structural
- Jul 19, 2006
- 23,162
Wouldn't want to be involved in this one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Article said:The HOA added that it is exploring its legal option and could pursue damages from several parties, including the developer, the original design professionals, the original contractors and the Transbay Joint Powers Authority.
Article said:The transit authority also said the high-rise is made of concrete rather than steel, "resulting in a very heavy building. This heavy structure rests on layers of soft, compressible soil. The foundation of the Tower, however, consists only of a concrete slab supported by short piles that fail to reach the bedrock below. That foundation is inadequate to prevent settlement of a building with the weight of the Tower."
JStephen said:I suspect a lot of lawyers will make a lot of money out of this and that's about the only positive aspect all the way around
BUGGAR said:Been reading about the engineers and such involved with Flint.
I was a concrete inspector on the BART Lower Market Street Station. I inspected the concrete used in the slurry walls on the south side of Market, 720 feet away from 301 Mission. As I mentioned, I met my wife here. Suppose I was watching her instead of the concrete pour. And as a result, after 45 years of seepage from bad concrete, the millenials had their building damaged?