Statesman
Mechanical
- Jul 26, 2002
- 15
Gents,
At present we are working on an older plant with very little PID Information. We have two pumps, each with the following duty (Design Rate 387 m^3/Hr Head:90M of water (8.82 bar))
They are connected in parallel, with only one pump running at a time (second as standby). They discharge to a 10" Header which has the following lines coming off it :-
2 No. 8" Line
3 No. 6" Line
1 No. 4" Line
1 No. 3" Line
After these take-offs, the 10" Line eventually reduces down to 3" and runs as a partial ring main, feeding the plant and eventually being discharged into drains (The majority of plant on this main is now redundant)
Off of one of the 6" Lines comes another 3" Module Header, which is, effectively used to supply a 1/2" Heater feed. (Again,Due to various plant redundancies over the years)This Module Header has, according to Plant Line list the following operating conditions (Op Press 7.7 Bar,Op Temp Amb,Design Press 19 Bar, Design Temp 38°C)
We propose to run another 3" Header from this 3" Module Header, this line will supply a couple of 1" Connections.
Due to the fact that a lot of the branches are now,in effect,redundant , when I come to work out my mass flow rate at my new 3" Header, is it safe to assume that the mass flow of the pump discharge will be split (Proportionally) between all of the branches off the 10" Header, bearing in mind that the information for a full network balance is not readily available, and therefore loading equivalents for these branches isnt available.
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated
At present we are working on an older plant with very little PID Information. We have two pumps, each with the following duty (Design Rate 387 m^3/Hr Head:90M of water (8.82 bar))
They are connected in parallel, with only one pump running at a time (second as standby). They discharge to a 10" Header which has the following lines coming off it :-
2 No. 8" Line
3 No. 6" Line
1 No. 4" Line
1 No. 3" Line
After these take-offs, the 10" Line eventually reduces down to 3" and runs as a partial ring main, feeding the plant and eventually being discharged into drains (The majority of plant on this main is now redundant)
Off of one of the 6" Lines comes another 3" Module Header, which is, effectively used to supply a 1/2" Heater feed. (Again,Due to various plant redundancies over the years)This Module Header has, according to Plant Line list the following operating conditions (Op Press 7.7 Bar,Op Temp Amb,Design Press 19 Bar, Design Temp 38°C)
We propose to run another 3" Header from this 3" Module Header, this line will supply a couple of 1" Connections.
Due to the fact that a lot of the branches are now,in effect,redundant , when I come to work out my mass flow rate at my new 3" Header, is it safe to assume that the mass flow of the pump discharge will be split (Proportionally) between all of the branches off the 10" Header, bearing in mind that the information for a full network balance is not readily available, and therefore loading equivalents for these branches isnt available.
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated