Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Privacy Fence Importance Factor 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

ron9876

Structural
Nov 15, 2005
669
What do you guys think about using an Occupany Category of I for privacy walls. I am in a hurricane prone region. Difference of I=0.77 or 1.00.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Who really cares if blows down - just call insurance company and replace it.

Yes - .77 seems reasonable - no risk to live or limb!!
 
privacy fences blow over at about 50 mph. you can design it all you want but it all comes down to quality of workmanship.

they dig the hole, cut open and pour in the dry sack mix, pour in some water, and mix the concrete with the fence post, then stake it off to set.
 
This will be masonry with a spread footing.
 
Can this wall be considered a fence? If so, then it can be designed for 90 mph wind per FBC.

 
Probably could be considered a fence. I think FBC has some special allowances for wood fences because they just don't work for full load. Also isn't that in the HVHZ area only?
 
@slickdeals, While I agree with the 90mph I believe it is limited to fences 6'-0" above grade and shorter. Otherwise you have to go with the full load. Back to the original question, I don't believe there's anything where the code mandates what I factor to use. It depends on office "standards". I tyically use I = 1.0 since in my experience it has not been that much difference in bars.
 
FWIW, fences and masonry walls failed en masse in the 2004 Florida hurricanes. Most that I observed appeared to have no engineering (I would hope), and most of the walls were URM.

From a flying debris standpoint, I would just like fences to have enough concrete to keep them on the ground. I think anything stricter than that is just silly like others have said.

For overturning or bending failure of CMU privacy walls, I think I usually use I=1.0, though I agree with MiamiSerg that it doesn't usually make much difference. Though you could justify I=.77 from a loss of life standpoint as it is not an inhabitable structure.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor