Jieve
Mechanical
- Jul 16, 2011
- 131
Hello,
Question about measurement of a part with a refined position control frame. Assume I have the part whose top view is shown in the picture. The circles on the inside of the part represent exaggerated tolerance zones of 4 hole axes to be drilled into the part. Datum A is the flat face perpendicular to the holes, and datums B & C are the side faces as shown. The following position control frame is used:
|Pos|Diam 0.15|A|B|C|
|Pos|Diam 0.05|A|
After receiving the machined part, I have four hole axes located at the centers of the smaller circles. The dimensions specified on the drawing between each hole and the next and from the datums to holes are all basic dimensions, horizontal and vertical. Now, how would this part be inspected without using CMM to ensure that the holes truly are within the tighter tolerance between each other when the pattern is rotated from the datums? Are the distances simply measured between the holes themselves (not the diagonal) and then checked to make sure all dimensions are within the basic dimension +/- 0.05 of each other, after initially verifying that all holes are within the larger tolerance zone?
I think I am being thrown off by the fact that the tolerance zones are rotated.
Thanks!
Question about measurement of a part with a refined position control frame. Assume I have the part whose top view is shown in the picture. The circles on the inside of the part represent exaggerated tolerance zones of 4 hole axes to be drilled into the part. Datum A is the flat face perpendicular to the holes, and datums B & C are the side faces as shown. The following position control frame is used:
|Pos|Diam 0.15|A|B|C|
|Pos|Diam 0.05|A|
After receiving the machined part, I have four hole axes located at the centers of the smaller circles. The dimensions specified on the drawing between each hole and the next and from the datums to holes are all basic dimensions, horizontal and vertical. Now, how would this part be inspected without using CMM to ensure that the holes truly are within the tighter tolerance between each other when the pattern is rotated from the datums? Are the distances simply measured between the holes themselves (not the diagonal) and then checked to make sure all dimensions are within the basic dimension +/- 0.05 of each other, after initially verifying that all holes are within the larger tolerance zone?
I think I am being thrown off by the fact that the tolerance zones are rotated.
Thanks!