Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Damping - square of velocity solution?

Status
Not open for further replies.

DDP

Structural
Apr 23, 2002
38
I am trying to model a simple dampened spring system with a mass under its own weight except I want the damping to be drag, thus proportional to velocity squared.

m y"(t) + c y'(t)^2 + k y(t) = W

When I graph the solution on MathCAD, it never decays, it is an endless oscillation. Any ideas?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Yup. In the real world the damping force always opposes the velocity.

Your rather silly formulation fails to do so and hence pumps energy back into the system.



Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
 
Energy is not pumped into the system Locock. The amplitude does not grow it stays constant.

My c coefficient is positive (.5*Cd*Area*density), but so is the c when you assume a linear relationship between damping and velocity. They both should have the same effect I would think. When I take out the squared it behaves like it should.
 
Then simply add to de second term a factor sign(y'(t)) to preserve the oposition.
 
I think I see what you're saying. Like Morison Equation where the drag term is Cd * w/2g * A * U * |U| ?
 
GregLocock. Your rather abrupt response fails to answer the question in enough detail.
 
It does however point the original poster in the right direction, which nobody in the preceeding 6 hours had managed to do.

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
 
OK, the problem is that you need to set up a force that always opposes the velocity, but that is proportional to velocity sqd. Hence ishvaaag's idea is on the right track but wrong.

So, we want -sign(v)*constant*(v^2)

Otherwise, as I intimated, for half of each cycle the OP's formulation pumps energy back into the system, hence it is not destructive, hence the amplitude does not decay. The reason I was negative about it is that (D)^2 is a very unnatural ODE to write, which should have set alarm bells off. Graphing the contribution of each would have revealed that immediately.


Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor