Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Current spiking X7R

Status
Not open for further replies.
HRearden

HRearden

Electrical
Oct 15, 2006
5
I'm attempting to degrade a 0.22 uF MLCC (X7R dielectric) through current spiking. What magnitude spike do I need to be slamming into this device in order to start causing damage? (even a rough order of magnitude would be helpful)

Spec sheets aren't getting me anywhere (I get a 500v rating, but no current information), and google isn't being very helpful. If anyone has either advice, or resources regarding this problem, it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
HRearden
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
I would imagine a 10kV, 1MA spike would do it nicely...

Dan - Owner
Footwell%20Animation%20Tiny.gif
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
While I'm sure that a 10kV, 1 MA spike would be enough to inflict damage, I'm trying to do this in a controlled manner.

"degrade", not "vaporize"... [thumbsup]
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Well those appear to be rated for DC service.
Feed one AC.
Feed one with 10% over its voltage rating.

Be helpful if you explained a bunch more. Part of Dan's facetious answer was due to the lack of any useful aspect to your test request.

Typically someone out to thrash components is doing it to prove the component is going to be robust enough for its task. The task being the environment and its connection to that environment.

A test should be comprised of taken-to-the-limit conditions expected in service.

Why are you testing this cap?

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.-
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
The rule with pulse currents is "consult factory." A good manufacturer should be able to give advice on reliaility and limits of pulsed currents. One thing I remember about ceramics is that the ceramic is a little piezoelectric meaning they change shape when pulsed creating mechanical stresses.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
"Typically someone out to thrash components is doing it to prove the component is going to be robust enough for its task. The task being the environment and its connection to that environment.

A test should be comprised of taken-to-the-limit conditions expected in service.

Why are you testing this cap?"

The focus really isn't on the cap; the cap happens to be part of the input filter to a power supply. My goal is to degrade the supply (on the component level)-in particular an input filter fault, and see if we can detect faults/failures as part of a diagnostic effort. Thus, I have a need for capacitors that are actually degraded, so that we can insert them into the supply to create the necessary fault condition.

Sreid: I have contacted the factory, but I've yet to receive any information back from them.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
"Degrade?"

In a "controlled" manner?

I think that you will have to rethink here.

Do you want to test the test rig/people to see if they can catch a faulty capacitor?

Wouldn't it be easier to arrange the fault outside the capacitor. In a controlled manner. Like using a resistor for leakage. A spark gap (one of those gas voltage arresters) for possible punch-through. A capacitor with wrong value for tolerance check. Or even a flakey connection for internal weld faults?

Having all these separate faults from a zap is probably not possible.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
We have had success with controlled degradation of other components (both mechanical and electrical) in the past. The reason I pose the question is the lack of technical information that I've been able to locate regarding the properties of the dielectric and potential current tolerance.

"Do you want to test the test rig/people to see if they can catch a faulty capacitor?" That's more or less the idea. We have algorithms in place to characterize these systems, and we want to be able to create a system that can achieve that automatically. As I said in the previous paragraph, the use of truly faulty materials has been successful in the past in similar efforts.

I just got an email back from AMC - they have no idea what the caps will tolerate. I guess it's "recon by fire" time...

Thanks for the input.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
OK Hank. I am interested in the result.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Yes I am too.

I also agree with Skogs in that the best solution is to simulate the possible failures.

You will never, ever, achieve the full range of possible results from the technique you are embarking on.

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.-
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Keith,

I insist on you or someone else asking why I named him Hank (I feel soo smart)

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Why did you name him Hank???
I thought 'H' stood for Harlequin. <just kidding>
I actually thought you were just being jocular. Like saying, "Okay Buddy".

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.-
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I thought you'd never ask!

I did read the "Atlas shrugged" by Ann Raynd. There is a guy named Hank Rearden. (And also John Galt, which is my alter ego in some Swedish fora).

There. Simple!

I am soo glad you asked.

BTW. I had a couple of beers with friends. German guys. So I am a bit more relaxed than usually.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Sorry, read Ayn Rand. The beers, probably...

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Even as an electrical engineer, I think I enjoyed The Fountainhead more than Atlas Shrugged (though both were great books). Ayn tends to be pretty long-winded in her descriptions, particularly of buildings in The Fountainhead, so I admit I occasionally skipped a few pages when she turned into a windbag. Still, I finished it in a day and a half.

Dan - Owner
Footwell%20Animation%20Tiny.gif
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Those numbers are for design. Going higher does not mean that you change the capacitor instantly. Not 50 % higher, probably not even 100 %. What happens is that a certain percentage of a batch will have a reduced life. Perhaps 10 kh instead of 100 kh - or something.

The problem is that any change will take a very long time and that you probably do not get a "nice degradation" but rather a complete failure.


Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Nayeem1993
  • Question
High magnetizing current
Replies
4
Views
3K
Nayeem1993
Nayeem1993
AnIlin
  • Question
Current transformer with air gap for power supply
Replies
2
Views
3K
AnIlin
AnIlin
schaplan
  • Locked
  • Question
Circuit/components to &quot;help&quot; battery through spikes in current draw
Replies
7
Views
895
sunnysky
sunnysky
csubhas
  • Locked
  • Question
Sporadic tripping of Residual Current Circuit Breaker (RCCB) /Earth Leakage Circuit Breaker (ELCB)
Replies
2
Views
625
che12345
che12345
KirbyWan
  • Locked
  • Question
What's the right power supply for high inrush current? 2
Replies
3
Views
309
KirbyWan
KirbyWan

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top Bottom