Lyrl
Materials
- Jan 29, 2015
- 67
Our company heat treats a 1/4 inch diameter bar with two bends. Material is 6150 steel. The part is austenitized and high pressure gas quenched.
Several months ago, a review of our processes for similar parts found this diameter is typically run with a less severe quench. (None of the other similar diameter parts have bends). I lowered the quench pressure for this part to standardize the process for similar diameter parts. We ran ~27,000 parts with the new lower quench pressure.
Then the customer notified us they were finding cracked parts (found after plating, but the plating was inside the crack indicating possible heat treat issue). They sorted and found ~9,000 parts with cracks, about 1 out of 3. I've attached a picture.
We ran several loads with the older, higher-pressure quench, and customer says no cracks. Customer has spent several months investigating their process and claims no changes to pre-heat treat operations occurred in this time period.
Our customer's conclusion of quench cracking due to the change in quench pressure is opposite of standard wisdom that less quench severity = less crack risk. Is it plausible that the reduction in quench severity is what triggered the cracks? Are there any tests you'd recommend as due diligence before we close our investigation?
Several months ago, a review of our processes for similar parts found this diameter is typically run with a less severe quench. (None of the other similar diameter parts have bends). I lowered the quench pressure for this part to standardize the process for similar diameter parts. We ran ~27,000 parts with the new lower quench pressure.
Then the customer notified us they were finding cracked parts (found after plating, but the plating was inside the crack indicating possible heat treat issue). They sorted and found ~9,000 parts with cracks, about 1 out of 3. I've attached a picture.
We ran several loads with the older, higher-pressure quench, and customer says no cracks. Customer has spent several months investigating their process and claims no changes to pre-heat treat operations occurred in this time period.
Our customer's conclusion of quench cracking due to the change in quench pressure is opposite of standard wisdom that less quench severity = less crack risk. Is it plausible that the reduction in quench severity is what triggered the cracks? Are there any tests you'd recommend as due diligence before we close our investigation?