Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Concrete Column Unsupported Length 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

amecENG

Structural
Jun 1, 2010
54
I am double checking what the standard practice is for determining the unsupported length of a concrete column on the first storey of a building (without getting in to anything like horizontal soil springs, etc) .

I have a situation where my footing was lowered about 9' below the slab on grade to accommodate some piping. Is the unsupported length from:
A) the underside of the slab to the top of the footing
or
B) the underside of Level 2 slab to the slab-on-grade. The slab-on-grade is 5" thick with mesh and the soil is properly compacted.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I would consider the below grade member to be a pier, not a column--braced in all directions.

DaveAtkins
 
Sounds like the pier is also the column; is it continuous from the footing to level 2?

If that is the case than both would be the unbraced length but worst case I think would be B. But you can only use the slab as lateral support if it is tied into the column with reinforcing.
 
I vote option 2.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.
 
I would actually go 3' below slab on ground as the point of lateral restraint. And I am saying this because I guess most of the lateral restraint of the footing would come from friction at the base more than the passive resistance of the soil.

And I would use 3' because that seems to be a common assumption where fixity is assumed for the lateral restraint of piles.
 
Thanks asixth, I think that is a valid assumption
 
With the 3' below grade assumption, would that be considered a fixed base at that level (K~0.7)? Or pinned (K~1.0)?

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.
 
I would use a K towards 1.

I would rely on the soil to provide the lateral restraint required but wouldn't try to create a rotational fixity of the column.
 
asixth's assumption is similar to my thought process for this type situation. I wouldn't assume a brace point by the slab on grade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor