Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ASME Section IX Interpretation

Status
Not open for further replies.

MrGezus

Petroleum
Apr 29, 2014
73
ASME Section IX 2015
Interpretation IX-13-19

I was reading through these and came across this one.

Interpretation: IX-13-19

Subject: QW-404.12, Hard-Facing Filler Metal Classification

Date Issued: August 27, 2013
File: 13-727

Question: A PQR shows SFA-5.21 metal cored filler metal classification ERCCoCr-A was used to qualify GTAW hardfacing
overlay WPS. Does this PQR support a GTAW hard-facing overlay WPS using SFA-5.21 bare (solid) filler metal
classification ERCoCr-A?

Reply: No.

Why is this the case? The only thing I can gather is that the extra C in ERCCoCr-A has some bearing, however I cannot find what the extra C is for.

I went to QW-404.12 thinking it might be in there. As far as I can tell QW-404.23 essential variable for HFO isn't it.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

QW-404.23 supports this interpretation because of the difference in chemistry. Change from metal cored or flux cored composite to bare solid electrodes and rods, and vice versa.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor