Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Vehiculat Collision 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

vooter

Structural
Dec 22, 2004
122
...which I have confused with impact loading.

I'm looking for an "equivalent static load" method to determine a load on a wall due to collision with a car, truck or other motorized land vehicle. There's a good method that FHWA/AASHTO has for *vessel* collisions with bridge piers, but I'm interested in coming up with a load that I could apply to the rear wall of a garage or a house near a highway or similar. The AASHTO LRFD manual has some information on "vehicular collision forces" (as opposed to "impact loads") but I couldn't use what they had since it seemed to apply mostly to railings.

Any assistance will be rewarded with my gratitude.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Argh! It should be "vehicular" not "vehiculat"!
 
Go to click past the first page and look for "Adler Anti-Ram Wall" at the lower left. Click on it, and you get a nice video showing how to stop a 65,000 lb truck traveling at 50mph. It's impressive.
 
My friends,

Look what I found...


The final Google search string was ""impact duration" vehicle."

The road I went down (pun intended) prior to this amazing find, was to compute the kinetic energy of a vehicle at a low velocity (5 mph). I equated this to the strain energy, 1/2 F X delta, etc. I really didn't like the approach since I didn't feel comfortable about elastic deformations related to concrete resiliance, etc. (visions of concrete chips flying off the wall are playing in my head - how do I estimate, accurately, reasonably, the chipping forces? Is it really necessary?) I've had a little bit of blast analysis (enough to be dangerous, but not enough need to use it and hence I don't have the edge I need), but since the low-velocity collision isn't "instantaneous," I kept thinking that I was overdoing things.

I also found that AISC Design Guide 18 "Steel-Framed Open-Deck Parking Structures" cites the National Parking Association's recommendation of applying a 10 kip concentrated load 18 inches above the riding surface.
 

ASCE 7-02 UNDER LIVE LOADS LISTS 6 KIPS AT 1'-6" WHICH I THINK HAS TO BE FACTORED WITH AN IMPACT FACTOR

 
Right in front of me... Thanks!
 
I agree with TFL. We've used the 6k @ 18" to design the vehicle barriers on several garages. I believe that when factored up it equals the AISC's 10k load.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor