Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

RCC Column Minimum Reinforcement ???

Status
Not open for further replies.

TekEngr

Civil/Environmental
Feb 4, 2012
148
I am designing a RCC column and under the loading (moment +axial) 250mmx250mm size of column is enough but due to the anchor bolt concrete cover requirements I need to increase the column size 750mmx750mm so my question is that I need to place the minimum area of reinforcement in the column according to the 250mmx250mm or 750mmx750mm.
If I follow 750x750 the minimum area of steel bar (1% x Ag) will be too much, so any one can provide the better solution in this regard???
thanks in advance

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Some codes allow using 0.5 percent in cases such as you described.
 
Why is 1% too much? Contractor complaining?

hokie - do you really use .5%? All the OG's trained us to stick with 1%. They only let us use .5% for lightly loaded pedestals.

"It is imperative Cunth doesn't get his hands on those codes."
 
@shahg123 - I've done something similar on a road reconstruction project where I was designing drilled shafts for to support a bunch of miscellaneous structures - bus shelters, water features, sculptures, light poles, low-rise seating walls, etc. First, I would check my design using 1% rebar with the minimum diameter required for strength then design the larger section with that rebar and compare my results. Typically I would up the rebar to 0.%5 of the larger section; in one case I was permitted to use .25%. However, I didn't have any situations where the ratio of diameters was 3 to 1.
 
MacGruber,
Yes. Not sure of the OP's code, but some do allow 0.5 percent of the oversized section.
 
In ACI 318-11, the 0.5% percent for oversized sections can be achieved with §10.8.4

§10.8.4 said:
For a compression member with a cross section larger than required by considerations of loading, it shall be permitted to base the minimum reinforcement and strength on a reduced effective area Ag not less than one-half the total area . . .
 
Nice. That is good to know.

"It is imperative Cunth doesn't get his hands on those codes."
 
Can you revisit the column conditions and see if you can reduce the column size a bit... going from a 250 column to a 750 column seems excessive.

Dik
 
Why are there any anchor bolts at all for a concrete column? Is this a precast element?

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor