Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Microbolometers vs. Photon detectors

Status
Not open for further replies.

jabonet

Mechanical
Oct 9, 2002
36
What could be the diference between a microbolometer capable of detecting temperature diferences of 0.1 K and a photon detector capable of the same 0.1 K.
Jabonet
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Based on that statement, none.

However, the primary difference is that the bolometer will require f/1 or so optics to achieve that, while a cooled detector can do that with f/3 or f/4 optics.

The next difference is that bolometers typically have slow response times to transient conditions, with thermal time constants on the order of 20 ms or so, while cooled detectors have integration times less than a few milliseconds. Therefore, a cooled detector will perform more accurately in a dynamic scene.

TTFN
 

There is also a difference in spectral response. The microbolometer will respond fairly uniformly across a wide wavelength range, while the photon detector will have a narrower spectral bandwidth and a greater response to longer wavelengths (because each photon is weighted equally, lower-power photons have greater weight).

CV
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor