casseopeia
Structural
- Jan 4, 2005
- 3,034
I tanked the budget for an assigned project, a leak investigation on 5-building complex. I finished up the bulk of the report on Friday. I'm not 100% done and already over-budget by about 50%. It’s not completely my fault. The budget was set and partially used up before I was hired. I came in at the end of the contract negotiation. And to make things worse, when I reviewed the budget prior to starting the work, I noticed that there was 20% of the fee left on the table due to a math error.
My question is
1. Do I mention it at the Monday staff meeting where project managers are asked for a quick review of their projects and budgets, or
2. do I try to catch the boss before the meeting (usually not possible unless I block his way to the men’s room), or
3. do I dodge answering the budget question at the staff meeting and catch the boss afterwards?
4. do some other option not included in the list above.
My inclination is to bring it up at the staff meeting and to also discuss that my postmortem analysis of the project budget revealed that when fees were divided by the number of tasks divided by an average billing rate, divided by the average number of people working on the project, I came up with about 1-1/2 hours per person per task to conduct an initial tour of the site, write a proposal, negotiate the contract, search for and review the construction documentation, develop a test protocol including a graphic analysis of building component transitions, coordinate the services of the test support contractor, carry out the tests, record data, analyze the data, and write the report.
An hour and a half is not nearly enough by any standard. But do I want to say that at the staff meeting? The boss is the one who set the budget and elected not to re-negotiate the contract for the fees left on the table.
"Gorgeous hair is the best revenge." Ivana Trump
My question is
1. Do I mention it at the Monday staff meeting where project managers are asked for a quick review of their projects and budgets, or
2. do I try to catch the boss before the meeting (usually not possible unless I block his way to the men’s room), or
3. do I dodge answering the budget question at the staff meeting and catch the boss afterwards?
4. do some other option not included in the list above.
My inclination is to bring it up at the staff meeting and to also discuss that my postmortem analysis of the project budget revealed that when fees were divided by the number of tasks divided by an average billing rate, divided by the average number of people working on the project, I came up with about 1-1/2 hours per person per task to conduct an initial tour of the site, write a proposal, negotiate the contract, search for and review the construction documentation, develop a test protocol including a graphic analysis of building component transitions, coordinate the services of the test support contractor, carry out the tests, record data, analyze the data, and write the report.
An hour and a half is not nearly enough by any standard. But do I want to say that at the staff meeting? The boss is the one who set the budget and elected not to re-negotiate the contract for the fees left on the table.
"Gorgeous hair is the best revenge." Ivana Trump