Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

DESIGN OF PURLINS

Status
Not open for further replies.

thomasian

New member
Jul 25, 1999
1
i am currently designing timber purlins, some references use the inclined spacing for roof(from KPa to KN/m ) some references use the horizontal spacing, which do you think should i prefer. although it would make a slight difference, i would like to make a correct analysis and design.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Ian<br>
<br>
Whether you use the horizontal (ie plan) spacing of purlins or the inclined purlin spacing depends on whether your load on the roof has been applied on plan or parallel to the rafter (ie inclined). I would match plan load with plan purlin spacing to be consistent and vice-versa for inclined. As you correctly state, the difference in result is minimal. As for the terms KPa & KN/m , 1 Pascal = 1 Newton per square metre, so to convert the figures you multiply the KPa by the purlin spacing (in metres) to get the conversion into KM/m.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
Ginger
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor