ljk80oze
Structural
- Aug 29, 2007
- 12
Hi
I am curious as to what embedment depth and end fixing arrangement is being specified for cast-in-bolts. AS3600 defines the development length of plain bars to rely on standard hooks, except that the straight extension shall be the greater of 8db or 140mm. Doesn’t this imply that a plain bar can only ever develop 50% of its capacity (limited to 1 hook).
When dealing with cast-in-bolts I have always specified a reasonable cast-in-depth of at least 20db (more in blockwork) and a bolt head & washer at the end of the bolt. The basis for this being that the end ‘head’ would develop the bar (>10 area of the bar – Cl. 13.1.2.6) and that anything shorter than 20db ‘doesn’t look right’. Cl 13.1.2.7 however, limits the development to hooks only and my approach would not comply.
What is the approach being adopted by other engineers? Is the 8db and 140mm straight extension for the cogs being used – this must be painful in blockwork?!?!
Also as follow on question: Is the approach being adopted for both grade 4.6 & grade 8.8 bolts? It seems flawed if the development lengths would remain the same – it seems intuitive that the development length in the embedment material should be proportional to the load……?
Cheers
Liam
I am curious as to what embedment depth and end fixing arrangement is being specified for cast-in-bolts. AS3600 defines the development length of plain bars to rely on standard hooks, except that the straight extension shall be the greater of 8db or 140mm. Doesn’t this imply that a plain bar can only ever develop 50% of its capacity (limited to 1 hook).
When dealing with cast-in-bolts I have always specified a reasonable cast-in-depth of at least 20db (more in blockwork) and a bolt head & washer at the end of the bolt. The basis for this being that the end ‘head’ would develop the bar (>10 area of the bar – Cl. 13.1.2.6) and that anything shorter than 20db ‘doesn’t look right’. Cl 13.1.2.7 however, limits the development to hooks only and my approach would not comply.
What is the approach being adopted by other engineers? Is the 8db and 140mm straight extension for the cogs being used – this must be painful in blockwork?!?!
Also as follow on question: Is the approach being adopted for both grade 4.6 & grade 8.8 bolts? It seems flawed if the development lengths would remain the same – it seems intuitive that the development length in the embedment material should be proportional to the load……?
Cheers
Liam