Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ASCE 7 seismic reduction factor (R) for a crane supporting frame

Status
Not open for further replies.

TTomaz

Structural
Jan 17, 2020
10
Dear all,

I'm reviewing a design of a crane supporting frame (near 10 m high and 20 m in width) which is connected from one column side to the other by tension-only rods and a light-weight non-structural roof. In this direction, the foundation footings are connected by beams.

We're talking about a high seismic area.

I would like to have your opinion on the appropriate reduction seismic factor (R) for a similar structure. Our guess is that it lies between a Ordinary Moment Frame R=4 and an inverted pendulum R=2,5, but considering an inverted pendulum would be excessively conservative. Opinions are welcomed.

Best regards.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You get to decide which R factor you choose based on how you detail the frame. If you feel that R = 2.5 is too conservative, then detail it as an OMF and use R=4. Some sketches or details of what your doing could help us guide you more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor