Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

analyse satique non lineaire ''pushover'' d'un pieu unique (avec SAP2000)

Status
Not open for further replies.

ranime

Civil/Environmental
Feb 28, 2021
1
slt pour tous
Quelles sont les étapes nécessaires à suivre lors de la modélisation.
Merci d'avance
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

ranime,

This site is manly an English speaking one, so you either need to ask in English or do some sort of translation.

But there is no detail to your question.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
 
Translation via Word

non-linerical satic analysis 'pushover' of a single stake (with SAP2000)

slt for all
What steps are needed when modeling.
Thanks in advance

 
I am not overly familiar with push-over analysis. However, I recommend you start with FEMA documents FEMA 356 and FEMA 440. A wealth of free information.
 
analyse satique non lineaire ''pushover'' d'un pieu unique (avec SAP2000)
I don't speak French (if that's what this is). But, I can sort of piece it out as 'nonlinear static pushover analysis of a single footing (using SAP2000)'.

slt pour tous
Quelles sont les étapes nécessaires à suivre lors de la modélisation.
Merci d'avance

Salutations all -

What are the necessary steps to following when modeling.

Thanks in advance

 
Some references that might help (from a Google search):


Note: I work for CSI, so I am not exactly an impartial observer. However, I'm fairly new to the company and not much of an expert in Push Over analysis. So, these links are really just what I've found on the subject that seemed useful. None of them directly reference single footings. To understand that better, I think I'd have to look through some FEMA documents or ASCE 41. My impression was always that the non-linearity of the structure was more likely to be accounted for in the superstructure itself rather than the foundation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor