CRiMCO
Civil/Environmental
- Jan 9, 2007
- 18
Well, here is one to chew on . . .
Our city maps (AutoCAD, dwn in R12, now editing in R2009 or R2011) generally run between 250kB and 700kB. But several are running from 9mB to 24mB. When opening one of these behemoths, the screen generates in a couple of seconds, but loading continues, along with a percent-loaded progress bar for perhaps another minute. Both in R2009 and R2011.
Here's what we have done:
Purged
-purged regapps, zero-length objects, empty text
deleted annotation scales
wblocked out
inserted wblock into a new drawing
deleted "All" and windowed out of the selection set the actual drawing while holding down the shift key.
checked for xrefs/images
The capper: each time we try a new strategy, like those above, the drawing grows by 1 to 1-1/2 mB! We started at 19mB file size, and it's now 24mB+
One thing . . . each of these drawings did have some large xreffed air photos in them which were later detached.
All ideas will be warmly appreciated!
Rocky . . .
Cheers . . . Rocky
Our city maps (AutoCAD, dwn in R12, now editing in R2009 or R2011) generally run between 250kB and 700kB. But several are running from 9mB to 24mB. When opening one of these behemoths, the screen generates in a couple of seconds, but loading continues, along with a percent-loaded progress bar for perhaps another minute. Both in R2009 and R2011.
Here's what we have done:
Purged
-purged regapps, zero-length objects, empty text
deleted annotation scales
wblocked out
inserted wblock into a new drawing
deleted "All" and windowed out of the selection set the actual drawing while holding down the shift key.
checked for xrefs/images
The capper: each time we try a new strategy, like those above, the drawing grows by 1 to 1-1/2 mB! We started at 19mB file size, and it's now 24mB+
One thing . . . each of these drawings did have some large xreffed air photos in them which were later detached.
All ideas will be warmly appreciated!
Rocky . . .
Cheers . . . Rocky