See attached drawing for reference. (assume this is in a drawing with title block tolerance and all other features properly defined)
A colleague asserts that this is acceptable, making the angle basic and nothing else. Plus no FCF controlling location. I'm not sure of the reasoning behind this...
In response to closed thread559-107337 by brrian, a possible solution.
I was trying to solve this same issue and the vague helpfile wasn't much help. After reading the above closed thread I tried the following and it's working.
Create a text file call dwgeditor.lsp and put it in your...
I stumbled across this dusty thread: thread1103-200480
I found it quite educational. Basically I've been assuming implied coaxial features on the same center is acceptable.
I'll be correcting my practices regarding this in the future.
My question is: What is an acceptable practical way to...
I have an old drawing showing a cylinder in profile and specifying the side of the cylinder as a datum. That datum is referenced by another cylinder elsewhere in the weldment, making a side of that cylinder parallel to the datum.
Is this an allowable call out? I'm thinking the datum and feature...
A part has a defined center line, features are symmetrical about that center line. Distance between the symmetrical features (tapped holes) is important. Is a dimension mandatory from the center line to a feature on one side?
Or is it allowable to leave that dimension out to imply symmetry and...
