Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    Wouldn't an end plate have to be larger (width and height) to accommodate a weld? If so, that will make it difficult to fit. In my mind, stiffeners would be the way to go.
  2. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    In my case, the joists are existing, but that's why I'm specifying PSL/LSL posts instead of green lumber.
  3. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    So, what other methods have you seen?
  4. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    The next time I find it, I will post here.
  5. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    I don't design for 1g vertical. The code requires Ev = 0.2 * 0.7 * SDS, allowable stress design. A random spot in downtown Los Angeles has a SDS =1.55, so the vertical force would be about .22g.
  6. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    That's why there was so much damage for an EQ much less than a design level EQ. Northridge is a thrust fault causing predominantly vertical acceleration whereas most of the faults in California are strike slip faults, which are predominantly horizontal.
  7. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    I realized that when I wrote the post, but I did it (wrote the post) anyway. It's there because I've had a plan check comment. While addressing the comment, I checked the code reference to verify, but I don't recall where it is. To me, a couple of A34s is not asking for much.
  8. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    No attachment? How would you comply with the "positive connection" requirement of the code? Perhaps that's only a requirement in the IBC and not the IRC. The Northridge earthquake, not a design level EQ, generated vertical accelerations of greater than 1g.
  9. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    Oops. My bad. It's a W8x15. I can put a pair of stiffeners near the end of the beam., but won't the nailer attached to the floor sheathing provide torsional resistance? Thank you for your response.
  10. SE2607

    Steel Beam to Wood Post Connection

    Does anyone see any issues with this detail? TIA
  11. SE2607

    Easy foundation work or a trap?

    I've done a substantial amount of this work (i.e., more than one project LOL), always through the general contractor where the foundation firm was a sub contractor. The work I've done is in California, so I always get a geotech, not for the AHJs pleasure but for my liability (more lawyers here...
  12. SE2607

    How to fix this?

    A concert grand piano weighs less than 1,500 pounds. Isn't it still a requirement of the code to design for a 2k concentrated load? My concerns are that the property owner will have banker boxes full of paper and stack them to the ceiling or have a library with bookcases running parallel to...
  13. SE2607

    The dangers of software and code changes

    What I have done to avoid the confusion, in my mind the load combinations become D+0.6W, etc. and D+0.7E, etc.
  14. SE2607

    One Drive - Am I the Last Person Using Dropbox for Business

    I use DropBox exclusively and, in fact have removed OneDrive (as much) as I can from my system. I keep all of my files in a folder under My Documents so that they are accessible from any of my devices. Prior to DropBox, I tried OneDrive. However, whenever I would save as file, I would get an...
  15. SE2607

    The beam is too deep Mr. Engineer

    I understand AISC's position on shear tabs not required to be designed for the eccentricity, but what about the column? If the distance between the bolts and the end of the shear tab is 1-1/2", there is a 1/2" gap between the end of the shear tab and face of column and the column is 3" wide...
  16. SE2607

    The beam is too deep Mr. Engineer

    Maybe I'm not visualizing it correctly, but wouldn't that connection induce moment into the column due to the eccentricity?
  17. SE2607

    The beam is too deep Mr. Engineer

    Rotational restraint? I'm assuming the original analysis considered the supports as pinned and free to rotate. I, too, like to have steel posts supporting steel beams, but, when I do, I weld the beam to the column (because, usually, there is no room for a cap plate) analyze the beam/columns as a...
  18. SE2607

    The beam is too deep Mr. Engineer

    If something like that happened on one of my projects, right after the jobsite visit, my next call would be to the state contractor's license board and would be persistent until I receive evidence that the contractor had lost his/her license.

Part and Inventory Search