Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by XFEM

  1. XFEM

    Welded Beam: the Welding aspect

    Thanks for the answers. We are in SouthEast Asia. Likely not at my firm understands AWS and welding details, because we rare use built up members [primarily business in buildings]. The fabricator wants to use less CJP because it need to be checked using UT not as PJP [according to D1.1, he...
  2. XFEM

    Welded Beam: the Welding aspect

    Hello, i am an new bridge design engineer. usually we design the welded wide flange in bridge truss and girder member as 100% capacity, and let the fabricator gave the member weld. Lately another fabricator asked about how it should be welded? And i was said that should be CJP [Complete Joint...
  3. XFEM

    Sloped Column Modelling

    Hmm the design is back to the manual check then. It's very stressful for seismic large problem.
  4. XFEM

    Sloped Column Modelling

    How to model sloped column in ETABS? not as brace.
  5. XFEM

    Cable Element : Validation? Books?

    Is there any books for discussing the cable element? Is there any recommended validation for cable element? NAFEMS?? Is there any good examples for modeling cables like sagging, how many mesh, and vibration modes? I am curious to the cable element, since likely every FEA has own variables on...
  6. XFEM

    What doesn't ABAQUS do well

    Please try the Eigen modes problem validation, especially from FEMAP shell and bending plate and compare with others.
  7. XFEM

    Welded Built-up Slender Compressive WF Beam per AISC 2005 E7

    Dear friends. I have checked some beam that needed for the truss structure. The structure needs the height of the beam 450mm. Since the truss wide enough, the beam is laying down, means the the minor axis is perpendicular to gravity axis. I've read the AISC LRFD 1999 and AISC LRFD 2005. I...
  8. XFEM

    Flange Width vs Deep of Beam Limit Criteria

    Nope, it's a frame of truss bridge, not a stringer
  9. XFEM

    Flange Width vs Deep of Beam Limit Criteria

    Effective with for composite? This is for truss bridge, not for composite bridge with slab. Effective width to Beam theory? I don't know. What i know is Timoshenko Beam theory consider the shear coefficient. It's that what you mean? I think it only effects on bendings which minor in this truss...
  10. XFEM

    Allowable Axial Pile N-SPT Safety Factor versus Allowable Displacement

    Yup, i usually check the allowable axial capacity just from unified formulas. When i check the deformation, i quite surprised.
  11. XFEM

    Flange Width vs Deep of Beam Limit Criteria

    Hi, i am designing a truss bridge. Is it possible to use fabricated steel section like I girder with 450mm deep [gross], 550mm width flange, 35mm thick web and 40mm thick flange? I know the boundary in AASHTO/AISC for limiting the minimum width of flange and thickness of flange and web due...
  12. XFEM

    Allowable Axial Pile N-SPT Safety Factor versus Allowable Displacement

    Hi, i am new here. I am designing deep pile foundation for building and bridge. 1. What allowable bearing capacity of deep pile is you more trust? a. based on Empirical Safety Factors methods :alpha methods Excel AASHTO , or Meyerhoff N-SPT excel, SPT97 / FB-DEEP N-SPT Allowable axial with...

Part and Inventory Search