In case anyone is interested here is a test specimen, with attached interface device, fixed to an MTS. The specimen is a simulated frame rail segment made of polypropylene/e-glass composite, the interface device was developed to test a method for affixing a suspension mount to a composite...
Great thread!
But it still leaves me wondering. As of right now I plan to strategically over-design the critical interface points to avoid damage to the chassis (8G's in each direction). The vehicle is intended to have a kneeling pneumatic suspension with 8+ inches of travel, so super low...
Thanks for your response, Greg.
The source of my concern is that an under-built design will cause irreparable damage my prototype. I am currently developing a method for integrating a trailing arm suspension to a composite monocoque chassis. If this vehicle were to undergo a 'worse case...
Been searching and lurking and have yet to find a credible answer to my question.. which is:
Is there a standard (design/safety factor) that automotive manufacturers use for calculating the necessary load bearing capability for critical mounting points (i.e. control arm ends, engine mounts...
