Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by Samwise Gamgee

  1. Samwise Gamgee

    Roof top unit - rigid body consideration

    If its bolted to the beam, it will only transfer shear, It cannot transfer moment. As of now, its not even connected, (so I am telling them to at least bolt it). The overturning force will try to topple the unit and it will add extra compression/tension on one end of the beam. On the tension...
  2. Samwise Gamgee

    Roof top unit - rigid body consideration

    How would that impact the lateral load ? Are you referring to snow drift potentially swaying the frame laterally ?
  3. Samwise Gamgee

    Roof top unit - rigid body consideration

    The unit is just sitting on the frame without any welds. So I am trying to analyze it as it is. If its not connected at the bottom , it cannot transfer any moment directly into the frame. So I wanted to resolve the moment as a T/C couple and check the beams for additional compressive load instead
  4. Samwise Gamgee

    Roof top unit - rigid body consideration

    Yes, there will be an additional downward load at this location which is not a concern. I am more concerned about the connections at the base as they can only transfer shear. The way I comprehend, the wind load will push the unit and there will be a T/C couple = 11*6/10 = 6.6kips (Load on each...
  5. Samwise Gamgee

    Roof top unit - rigid body consideration

    I have a heavy roof top unit which is supported on a steel frame which sits on HSS posts. The base connections of RTU to the steel frame can only transfer shear. As the unit is heavy and the resisting moment is greater than the overturning moment , can we idealize this as a rigid body and design...
  6. Samwise Gamgee

    Mill reports for redesign

    On a project, due to some miscommunication, one of the areas was designed for lower occupancy. The project is all constructed and about to be occupied. When I ran numbers for the higher occupancy, a total of 4 beams and 3 connections are overstressed. Beams : 2 have a strength DCR of8-10%, 2...
  7. Samwise Gamgee

    Sliding resistance from adjacent footing

    I have a condition for braced frames forces at foundations. Footing 2 has uplift and its self weight + soil above + dead load from building is adequate to resist the uplift. However when uplift and shear happen at the same time, the weight itself is not enough to resist both sliding (as most of...
  8. Samwise Gamgee

    Mean Roof Height vs modeling in RAM

    However, for a monoslope roof ASCE permits us to use mean roof height at the eave height which is 25'-4 1/2" (for slopes less than 10 degrees). So what I modeled is for a mean roof height of 28.5 is conservative anyway. Is that safe to say that?
  9. Samwise Gamgee

    Mean Roof Height vs modeling in RAM

    I did perform a hand calculation to confirm the base shears. My hand calculation was less than what RAM applies. So I am not really concerned about the base reactions in comparison to what RAM is applying. Also RAM applies load using Wind Load for all heights. (If I consider low residential...
  10. Samwise Gamgee

    Mean Roof Height vs modeling in RAM

    I have an untopped metal deck and I designed it to envelope both flexible and rigid behavior. Its a single story building.
  11. Samwise Gamgee

    Mean Roof Height vs modeling in RAM

    I have a monolsope roof with varying heights on either side. (High side : 30'-4 1/2", Low side : 25'-2 1/2"). Mean roof height = 27'-9" When modeling in structural RAM system, I modeled it as a mean roof height of 28'-6". Is that considered a conservative/safe approach for the application of...
  12. Samwise Gamgee

    Crane Wheel Loads (Impact etc)

    I am designing framing/foundations to support bridge crane and have a couple of questions. The crane operates as shown in both directions. I have a question in regards to impact load. Design guide-11 has an example which says the impact load is 20% of the load equally distributed between the...
  13. Samwise Gamgee

    Tension and Shear in two different set of bolts

    I have a condition where there is moment and shear across the connection. Is it appropriate to design the moment to be resolved into tension force in the top bolts and shear to be taken by the bottom bolts ?
  14. Samwise Gamgee

    Column design in moment frames (for cladding spanning vertically vs horizontally)

    I have a system with moment frames and the analytical software I used adds wind load based on the wall exposure heights. However the actual condition I have is the walls are spanning horizontally. Per what I analyzed (in the screenshots below) , the columns will see an additional moment I need...
  15. Samwise Gamgee

    KL/r > 200 (Weak Axis)

    I have a moment frames which will cause axial load in the beams. The software flags that KL/r > 200 (for weak axis buckling). Question : As deck is perpendicular to the beam, can we consider the deck would brace the beam in Y-axis and effective length in Y-direction won't be the full length of...

Part and Inventory Search