Recent content by JARivera1

Thanks for your feedback r6155. Believe or not there are CWIs that skipped the obvious requirement

Thanks for your feedback r6155. Believe or not there are CWIs that skipped the obvious requirement

Thanks GD2 for your feedback, I will post the follow up, I am doing to a field case

Table 331.1.3 Exemptions to Mandatory PWHT; simple question: fourth column header referrers Notes (3)-(5); it is mean that notes 3, 4 and 5 apply? to me yes, but may be a gap for somebody that 3 and 5 only; normally when is not well applied; if the designer has specified PWHT in the piping...

Thanks again bimr & rconner for your feedback. Absolutely helpful. I am sorry I do not know IMO; I know one IMO-International Maritime Organization; is this what your refer?

Thanks bimr & rconner for yor feedback. Rconner you are right, it is for a new main installation. A straight section 14 m of 1640 m approximately is not going to be tested plus the tie-in sections (each end). There is no way to test unless test the entire system. Is there any precedence to...

Is any provision in AWWA to support/justify no to test a DIP spool piece or tie-in