Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by 1prsplmps1

  1. 1prsplmps1

    Neoprene

    blake989: Just to let you know that I've received your fax, thanks! Excellent info!! youngstructural: It does not hurt to have those too.. Send them to the fax shown above your post, thanks in advance!
  2. 1prsplmps1

    Neoprene

    blake989: That is a good beginning, the fax # is 704-358-8342. ATT. to Jamie/Pedro, thanks!
  3. 1prsplmps1

    Neoprene

    dbuzz: Before I wrote this post I did a little research on the issue and had no luck. JStephen: Is a good idea but I need to have something from a manufacturer/distributor on record. Thanks for your prompt responses!
  4. 1prsplmps1

    Neoprene

    Greetings: Does anyone know where to find the coefficient of static friction of neoprene (plain 50 durometer) on steel and neoprene on concrete? Thanks in advance..
  5. 1prsplmps1

    Torsional analysis of a beam with web stiffeners

    JAE: Great analogy and great link, thanks!!
  6. 1prsplmps1

    Concentrated Torque on Wide Flange

    You can increase the torsional capacity of this WF by connecting stiffeners at the end of each side of the top and bottom flanges. Basically you'll be creating a box member, which is very efficient in torsion.
  7. 1prsplmps1

    Torsional analysis of a beam with web stiffeners

    Actually stiffeners for steel WF lintels supporting eccentric siding loads had been used to increase the warp coefficient (@ the stiffeners location) and therefore to increase a bit the torsional capacity of the WF. ASCE have few journals on the subject..
  8. 1prsplmps1

    CANOPY WIND LOAD

    Yes, I guess I'll have to bite the bullet..
  9. 1prsplmps1

    CANOPY WIND LOAD

    UcfSE: the trusses slope is 2:12 therefore 5.0 ft and the elevation at beam/truss bearing. = 30'-0”. You can imagine how critical this height is for this design. Thanks for your interest!! 1prsplmps1
  10. 1prsplmps1

    Pressure Loading due to Wind

    ThomasH: yes, that would depend on how precise AnthonyR wants to be. As you know the 0.003 value really is 0.00256 that came from the density of air at roughly 60 deg. F. at standard atmospheric pressure. Then this density (0.00237… slugs/ft^3) is multiplied by (.5)[(5280 ft/mi)/(3600...
  11. 1prsplmps1

    Torsional analysis of a beam with web stiffeners

    jimrcasper: I do not know how precise you wanted to be but SAP2000 is a good software. In addition, you can divide your beam+stiffener in several sections (x section wise) to calculate geometric properties of the whole system, stresses, angle of twist, etc. Any mechanics of material book can...
  12. 1prsplmps1

    CANOPY WIND LOAD

    UCFSE: the 4,800# value may be OK for uplift forces but I think is high for horizontal force.
  13. 1prsplmps1

    I-beam support by foundation walls

    Cody: virtualengineer's advise is wise since he is backing up his answer with AISC.. 1prsplmps1
  14. 1prsplmps1

    Pressure Loading due to Wind

    Just use the typical 0.003*V^2 to obtain your result in psf.
  15. 1prsplmps1

    CANOPY WIND LOAD

    Greetings; It seems that ASCE7-02 does not cover wind load in canopy trusses (i.e open building). I am working on a steel canopy with cold formed trusses @4'-0" o.c. and spanning 60'-0". If I use a tributary area of 4’x60’=240 sf x (say 20 psf) =4,800# per truss which I believe is tooo...

Part and Inventory Search